Showing posts with label salvation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label salvation. Show all posts

Thursday, December 26, 2013

Conde Lucanor (1335) - Don Juan Manuel



Sobre el autor y su obra
-          Medieval Spain, 1282-1348
-          Noble – nephew of Alfonso X of Castile; titles of Lord, Duke, and Prince
o   He really wanted to have a big noble title – he was always resentful about his lack of good title; this influences some of his works, such as El libro de los estados
-          Politician, soldier, and writer
-          Religious influence:
o   Influence of Dominic order in Don Juan Manuel’s upbringing – objective: vigilar por la fe; very pro-establishment
§  There are various stories in his work that have to do with the Dominic order folks
o   The contrary to Dominic order is the Franciscan order – rather anti-establishment, idea of teaching by example
-          Wrote in Castilian, rather than Latin (like Alfonso X) – wrote in vernacular to facilitate access to literature for a greater number of Castilian readers
-          Works are directed to a variety of social classes (not only upper class and lords, but rather lower class and vassals)
-          Themes: preoccupation with both practical and spiritual life
-          He’s a bit revolutionary in that he is conscious that he’s writing something that can/will be useful to others
-          He’s very philosophical, especially compared with Juan Ruiz, who’s very hands-on

Descendants/Family of don Juan Manuel & Implications for royalty
-          Enrique de Trastamara came from his family line a bit later on down the road – yay nobility!
-          Marriage for alliance purposes (rather than for any romantic notions) --- married someone who was in opposition to the royal family (as way of moving forward his own advancement goals) – an Aragonesa (they were against Castilians)
-          Don Juan Manuel really wanted to have a big noble title – he was always resentful about his lack of good title; this influences some of his works, such as El libro de los estados
-          Don Juan Manuel is representative of the rebellious nobility typical of the time period that wants to have power no matter what.
-          Don Juan Manuel breaks his own bonds with the royal house; breaks his vassalage because he doesn’t feel like the royalty has met his needs --- he wrote a letter explaining this

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
El Conde Lucanor

Temas importantes: Conde Lucanor
-          Counsel of how to act/behave, to youth especially
-          Didactic purpose
-          Orality
o   Very repetitive
o   Follows a set formula/frame – easier to remember to tell
o   The listener/reader anticipates structure/concept
o   “All medieval literary production is intended for oral reproduction” (Professor). A text like Cantar del mio Cid is always meant for oral purposes, it's kind of an exception that it was recorded in a written manuscript. Meanwhile, a text like Conde Lucanor was meant to be written, innately connected with a text - but still intended for oral reproduction.
o   Spanish literature is proverbial – proverbs can be found in all literature in Spain.
-          Memory (and relationship of memory with intellect and will/voluntad)
-          Objective/goal = salvation (idea of message of what is necessary for salvation)

Structure of El conde lucanor
-          51 “example” stories, within a frame/“marco”
-          The structure of stories in El Conde Lucanor reflects the ordinances and hierarchical structuring of the medieval world. In the first parts a young nobleman, Lucanor, proposes an abstract/worldly problem to Patronio; later, he gives an apologue which extracts the solution from Patronio's tale, applying it to himself. Juan Manuel (a character listening to the conversation) concludes the story with a short verse, condensing the moral of the story into short, concrete statements.
-          Idea of story within a story – the example given in each story is kind of a separate, detached entity

El ejemplo XI y los comienzos de la prosa artística
(Ejemplo XI: “De lo que  contesció a un deán de Sanctiago con don Illán, el grand maestro de Toledo”)
-          Summary of story/example: Count Lucanor asks Patronio for advice. Luc has started to do a man a favor, in exchange for which the man promised to do Luc any favor requested in return. But, Luc has tried to cash in this favor, and the man keeps making excuses. Patronio offers as counsel the story of a dean of Santiago and the grand master don Illán. The dean wanted to learn necromancy from the don Illán. But the don Illán didn’t think he would ever do him any favor in return due to his high social class. Dean promises to favor him, and Illán finally agrees. They start their lessons. Early on, the dean gets word that the Archbishop is ill, but he doesn’t want to abandon his lessons. A few days later he gets word that the archbishop has died, and he is up to be elected in his place. Later still, he learns that he is indeed the new Archbishop. Illán is pleased to hear this, and asks if the now empty position of dean can be given to one of his sons. The Dean/Archbishop refuses and says he will favor him later. Later, the dean/archbishop is advanced further, and Illán reminds him of the favor he is owed, asking if the new position of archbishop can be granted to his son. The Dean/Archbishop refuses again and promises a later favor. The same thing happens a bit later, with another advancement. The guy is eventually advanced to Pope, and never repays Illán the favor. Illán protests and the guy/pope treats him badly, so Illán bails at last and returns to his home town. Illán does some necromancy trick, in which the dean is immediately returned back in time to the beginning of the lessons, and Illán turns him away since he has exposed his true nature. Thus: Patronio’s advice is for Luc not to put his neck out to help this man, when he may not ever repay him the favor. Lesson’s final verses: “If you help a man who gives you no thanks, the more he prospers, the less will he help you.”


General Notes
-          Orden vs. desorden
o   Obra es un intento de recomendar orden para la vida
-          Genre: libro de ejemplos / exemplum
o   Mejor colección de ejemplos que existe en español, y el más complejo
o   Many of this type of text don’t have a “marco” or frame – don Juan Manuel gives it a common frame (all under context of conde Lucanor and Patronio)
o   Idea of it being a sort of “how-to” manual
-          Text in 5 parts – three more expansive parts, narrows down at end into two more specific parts… it gets more and more difficult to comprehend as you get farther in.
-          For common people, it’s hard to remember the moral, but it’s easier to remember the example
-          Don Juan Manuel applies these morals to practical problems… rather secular
-          Several religious orders established in this time period
o   These orders preached in vernacular, often preaching against heresy
o   Dominicanos
o   Franciscanos
-          Los ejemplos de don Juan Manuel no son una creación original de él en muchos casos – he took them from other sources, and modified them to his purposes (just like Berceo’s Milagros)
-          Don Juan Manuel always wanted a kingdom – bitter about not having any title
o   Wanted a big title to be able to remain prevalent in history even after his death
-          All medieval writers dedicate their texts to nobles, because they know that they can receive something in return
-          Gothic influence – realismo gótico
-          The moral and story are somewhat separate in some ways – if someone reads and doesn’t like the moral, they don’t have to accept it… they can infer a different moral from the story based on their own interpretation
-          Vida activa vs. vida contemplative
o   Active – cardenales
-          Example III
o   Rey Ricardo
-          Idea of San Agustin’s theory of the faculties of the soul: intellect, will/voluntad, and memory
o   Conde Lucanor as a work of “memory” because Patronio is remembering all of these examples in order to teach Conde Lucanor (and audience)
o   Patronio appeals to Conde Lucanor’s intellect in order to come up with a solution; solution is an act of will, because Lucanor must act in agreement with what he learns
o   Viesso/refrán/moraleja al final – summarizes/remembers the entire story, short and sweet style… indicates the main point (the only thing you need to remember); if you remember this, you can apply the same message/teaching to a different situation
-          Idea of collective vs. individual voice:
o   As the renaissance comes on, there is a development of a more individualized voice. Conde Lucanor retains a rather collective medieval mentality, in which the characters are representative of the public in general. The Conde Lucanor and Patronio are symbolic constructs, rather than voices representing an individual thought (that of the author, Don Juan Manuel, for example).
-          Example I: “What happened to a king with his favorite”
o   Exemplum: A king has been told by jealous nobles that his favorite adviser wants to kill him. So the adviser is warned that he’s in problems, so the adviser decides to go to the king and lie and say that he will follow him anywhere and will always be faithful. The king decides that the adviser is good after all, and so he doesn’t kill him.
o   So, the text isn’t trying to suggest a search for truth all the time. It’s a manual for nobles – sometimes the best thing you can do is lie.
-          Idea about truth – the ultimate truth is God’s truth, so everything all works out in the end…


~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
El libro de las armas / Las tres razones

Basic Idea
-           A sort of justification of who he (the father, don Juan Manuel) is today, what he has done that has led to this identity, why he has the armas that he has, etc.
o   Justifying his political position; justifies his rebellion against royal house – through evocation of his arms
-          Very fictionalized autobiography
-          Intended audience: Don Juan Manuel’s children
-          This is one of Don Juan Manuel’s works which has received the most critical attention, since it appears as one of the earliest autobiographies in literature
-     

General notes
-          His arms: declare his royal/noble connection and have symbolic significance
o   Lion – symbol of royalty, strength/power, kingdom of León
o   Wing
o   Sword – strength, power, reference to cross; “la espada lobera” (passed down through family line?)
o   Mano + ala = Manuel (wowww…)
-          Begins text by writing about a dream
o   Essential aspect of life
o   (stuff in secondary sources) – Borrero article
o   He uses it as evidence of divine favor (like in the Cid, and also in Poema de Fernán Gonzalez… also in Leonor de Cordoba later)

-          Importance of testimony – Borrero article
o   Importance of testimony of vision rather than testimony of hearing (testimony of vision is preferred); you can manipulate what is heard (gossips/liars, etc.) but you can’t change what is seen
o   Crosses over into New World topics as well (chronicles)
o   Testimonio de vista en primera persona is the start to the whole thing; the central base (people who write texts recounting what they know as eye witnesses)
o   Testimony of vision gives sense of authenticity; you can trust it
o   *** Don Juan Manuel mixes both types of testimony – vision and hearing (“this is what I have heard noble people say in the court”)… this gives more value and authenticity to his text
§  The heard testimonies he gives are from trustworthy people
o   There is a huge biblical basis for the importance of testimony, which would have definitely influenced its significance in [religious] medieval society

-          Text is fiction mixed reality
o   Fiction to beautify the reality – set within a particular context to give the message he wishes to convey in the most effective and pretty manner

-          Religious context/influence
o   Theme of divine blessing – (example: idea of one of biblical Noah’s sons, Japhet, who receives the divine blessing and thus initiates the preferred line – European)
o   Basic/underlying (and unstated but implicit) frame is that don Juan Manuel is proclaiming his willingness and desire to serve until the Second Coming; he is presenting his family as good soldiers to serve until that point
o   Sets up the idea that his family is constantly in relation/communication with God – they are behaving the way that God wants them to; following divine will

-          *** Major theme: how to find the truth (searches for it in these testimonies… then – is the truth that he finds really true?)


~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
El libro de los estados (1327-1332)

-          Goal of the medieval man when he’s reading – understand more about the world; knowledge based on reliable authorities
-          Style of the work: questions and answers between a king and his son, and a gentleman who raised the son and a philosopher
-          Objective of the work: religious salvation
-          Don Juan Manuel establishes himself as a figure of authority, rather than relying on previously used authorities – a change! This shows a development in the significance of the author in his own text.
o   The work is based on Barlaam y Josafat – but Don Juan doesn’t say that. He uses this strategy to establish his own authority.
o   Don Juan Manuel also cites himself, rather than citing others.
-          Example 33
o   The king is symbolized by an eagle. Idea of authority – eagle is the “king” of the birds.
o   Falcon – also noble bird, represents an important noble
o   Summary/events – the falcons hunt, but the eagle takes the prey away. The falcon has to cede to the eagle, because the eagle is more powerful. The falcon gets fed up and the birds fight.
o   Allegorical concept: The message reflects Don Juan Manuel’s own situation, in which he’s a powerful noble, but the king abuses his rights against him.
o   Idea that Don Juan Manuel is justifying his rebellion against the king by explaining the injustice that he faced.

-          Idea that medieval society is a reflection of divine society. If there’s a king on earth, it’s because there’s one in heaven. This is the correct way of doing things, because it’s what is done in heaven. So the king is justified in his position, because someone has to be the leader – just like God is in heaven.

-          Three sections/states of society (estamento); these social groups are divided by “privilegio,” or certain rights that distinguish them
o   Oradores – monjes (privilegio – outside of secular law, under canonic law; privilegio of fighting for the faith)
o   Defensores – nobleza (privilegio de poder)
o   Labradores – clase baja (this is divided two ways – the ones that work in cities, and the ones that work the land)
-          *Important distinction: Omnes ricos – gente con mucho dinero; ricos omnes – nobleza, richness of character
-          Idea of impossibility of movement between social classes – everyone stays in the class that they are born into. Anyone who starts a revolt/revolution is a heretic – because it’s like questioning the holy kingdom, since the royal kingdom is a reflection of heaven.
o   For Don Juan Manuel, his reaction is never a revolution – it’s a reaction against injustice. It would be different if he had started a social revolution/war type deal.
-          This is the only work in vernacular language that deals with themes of social class/inheritance from the perspective of a great noble.

-          La visión organizista – use of the metaphor of the human body
o   This was significant in various of Don Juan Manuel’s texts (especially El libro de los estados) but also in medieval literature in general
o   Idea that the body serves as a “house” for the soul – so that means that the human body is composed of various parts… you are two parts: the body and the soul
o   The body reflects the personality/nature of a person
o   The society is a body, with different organs/functions – different body parts represent different functions
§  This is derived in some ways from biblical idea
§  Hierarchal organization – head is superior, represents superior group (defensores)… all the parts are essential/necessary, but not all are as important
§  Three general sections that are spoken of – head, torso, and legs

Libro de buen amor (1330-1343) – Juan Ruiz, Arcipreste de Hita



Sobre el autor, Juan Ruiz, y la obra
-          Ruiz
o   Spain, 1283-1353?
o   We don’t know very much about his life; since he wasn’t a great noble or anything, things weren’t always preserved
o   Was writing basically at the same time as Don Juan Manuel – represents another class (clerical, rather than  noble)
o   He’s rather hands-on, especially compared with an author like Don Juan Manuel, who is very philosophical
o   He reflects the growing education level of society (in comparison with writers like Berceo, a century before)
o   Ruiz also wrote poetry, which was rather well-known during the time period
o   He writes that he was in prison – but this could have been a metaphor for his previous worldly life; we don’t have any way of knowing
-          This work was written about halfway through the 14th century
-          The Book of Good Love (El Libro de Buen Amor), considered to be one of the masterpieces of Spanish poetry, is a semi-biographical account of romantic adventures by Juan Ruiz, the Archpriest of Hita, dating initially 1330 which he completed with revisions and expansions in 1343.
-          The work is considered as the best piece in the medieval genre known as Mester de Clerecía.
-          The Book begins with prayers and a guide as to how to read the work, followed by stories each containing a moral and often comical tale.

Comps ideas to consider
-          What is known about Ruiz’s life?
-          Why is this work important?
-          How does this work relate to themes of didacticism and salvation typical in medieval literature?
o   Use of examples!!! (like exemplum…)

Themes / Basic ideas
-          Irony, sarcastic tone
-          Sexuality, sex, women
-          Sin, different types of sin
-          Compares divine love (bueno) and human/carnal love (loco) with the purpose of guiding the reader to good/salvation
-          Didactic message… – idea that he give examples of carnal love to show the reader that the best love is divine (God)

Structure and Style
-          Text starts with a sermon, based on a line of the gospel… “te doy intelecto para que pruebes todas las cosas, pero voy a poner en ti mis ojos”
o   Idea: Men sin constantly, but they have to choose the path to salvation.
o   Thus, Ruiz discusses what he has chosen in his life, and what he has tried.
-          Contains various styles of poetry, but a lot of it is written in mester de clerecía
-          Contains a section of lyrical poetry – cantigas a la virgen María
-          Book is a collection of various stories/accounts, all about arcipreste (más o menos)

Main idea of the text
-          Genre: an anthology – aim to be something different/distinct, but doesn’t ever accomplish this
-          It’s an anthology with a narrative strand – but the strand frazzles out toward the end of the work
-          An attempt to give an account of Juan Ruiz’s life – doesn’t really do this, because it’s too broad; includes all of his writings
-          Many of the stories try to express the goodness of God and God’s love, Virgin Mary’s love, etc.
-          Sense of autobiography – Ruiz narrates in first person, identifies himself by name

Autobiographical aspect of work (Holly’s presentation)
-          Ruiz uses first person narrative voice throughout the text
-          Conflict between secular and religious perspectives of the “yo”
o   Loco amor and buen amor
-          Idea of the “yo” as a didactic function in the text – perhaps Ruiz uses his experiences of loco amor to show others not to do the same.
-          The text is essentially a compilation of various texts/genres, therefore various sections have different influences and are derived from different sources. So the “yo” has to correspond to all these different sources, and their original intentions.
-          Medieval autobiography – “a way of reading more than a way of writing”
-          Critical idea that the text does not have one specific goal/message – each section has potential to teach something different
-          Binomial narrative technique
o   Ambiguous distinction between lover and cleric
o   First-person narration unifies opposing perspectives
o   Provides structural transitions between episodes (ex: transition between serranas and the prayer to the Virgin)
o   Alternating verb tense (past/present)
-          Three structural functions of Juan Ruiz’s “yo”
o   Author – references the creation of the text; uses the past tense
o   Narrator – presents and summarizes individual episodes; uses the past tense
o   Protagonist – appears as either cleric or lover and develops individual episodes; uses the present tense
-          Autobiographical discourse encourages a structural, not didactic, reading of the text

General notes
-          Chronology / time period and the medieval concept of the universe are very important in this work, especially in comparison with a work like Berceo’s Milagros
o   Proposes image of the universe in which the world is in the center, with God/heaven surrounding the earth, and also the zodiacs/elements influencing man
o   Idea of the presence of paradise – concept that in Christ’s crucifixion, he reopened paradise
o   Work reflects the liturgical year
-          *** Idea that the world is run by two things: amor (sexo) y comida (estómago)
o   Food is central to the mystery of Christianity (mass, last supper)
-          Idea of beauty/appearance
o   Description of Juan Ruiz’s appearance (in the text) (c. 1485-1489)
§  It’s an almost monstrous description/appearance – it is a deformation of the classic version of a description of beauty/appearance (use of irony, sarcastic tone)
§  Ruiz indicates that he has black hair – this is negative, associated with moors and evil, and sensuality
§  This is an ironic/sarcastic description.
§  Compares himself with “pavón” (peacock) – connotation of arrogance
§  Use of color red – association with sensuality/sexuality
o   Image of beauty is rooted in Visigoth heritage – very Aryan: blond hair and blue/green eyes
§  Ex: Virgin Mary is always pictured this way in iconography
o   If someone didn’t match this ideal of beauty, they sometimes changed that fact in writing (lied)
o   This idea of beauty/appearance was a topic of rhetoric that everyone learned – when describing someone, you start at head and go down.
-          The character of Juan Ruiz doesn’t necessarily reflect 100% the reality of Juan Ruiz – it’s a persona that Ruiz creates to fulfill his purposes for the text.
-          Description of a woman, “la mujer chica” (c. 1606-1617)
o   Says he doesn’t like tall women; he likes short women – thus this woman (and her beauty) don’t follow the conventional ideas of female beauty… a typical beautiful woman would be tall
o   Says short women are the best; they are good in bed
o   Variety of metaphors comparing small and big things; conclusion: small things are always best
o   Play on words: if you have to sin it’s best to sin a “little bit” (with a smaller woman) than a lot (with a tall woman)
-          Book was probably intended for a rather reduced audience, because it includes some rather scandalous themes
-          Idea that the sin is general – there’s not anyone exempt from sin. Thus, he can write about sinful themes in his book – he justifies it by doing the service of informing his audience about various different types of sin.
-          Arabic/Jewish element
o   Exposes the manner in which the three cultures co-exist in the time period (Christians, Jews, and moors/Arabs)
o   Various references to both moors and Jews
o   Demonstrates a rather profound familiarity with Arabic culture (example: indicates use of exclusively Arabic instruments in cantares)
-          Central metaphor of the text:
o   Idea of the nature of the world and its creation, as well as the creation of language… God over everything. Humans create language and symbols, but God created everything.
o   Idea of different interpretation by different people – comes from Bible, Tower of Babel
o   Can be seen in the example of the Greeks and Romans –

-          Story of the Greeks and Romans (debate)
o   One of several examples/stories about the transmission of the empire
§  The Greeks give up power to the Romans… the world is made up of people who use signals/symbols to communicate. But these symbols are a divine creation, and everything that happens in the world is God’s will…
o   Idea of cultural relativism – different people understand different things differently… what everyone understands is correspondent to their own capacity
§  This idea is based on Bible – Tower of Babel
o   Context of a scholarly debate over a law/belief.
o   The Romans are represented by a rustic low class cheat. They dress him up well – idea of deceit in covering the truth
o   Narrator suggests that although the Romans want the law, they shouldn’t have it (shouldn’t win the debate)
o   There’s a language barrier – so they decide to debate with signals. But they don’t understand each other.
o   Message – even signs/signals depend on culture; no sign/signal is universal. The Romans and the Greeks have different knowledge and memory in their respective cultures.
-           
-          Various of Ruiz’s stories are not actually his creations, but rather are adaptations

-          “Las ranas que demandaban un rey”
o   A fable with animals as characters – about the beginning of the differences between people. The frogs ask God for a king; he sends them a stork, and the stork eats them.
o   Message: Be careful what you ask for
o   Different types of people, all set by God – God sets the social structure; God decides what happens

-          “Cruz, cruzada, panadera”
o   One of the most well-known stories/poems of the text
o   Autobiographical – something that happened to Juan Ruiz
o   Summary: Juan Ruiz wants to get with a chick called Cruz. He sends a friend as a go-between, but the friend takes advantage of the situation and gets with Cruz himself.
o   Double meaning in “Cruz/cruzada/panadera” – reference to a woman but also to Christ…
§  Lost in the world, where he can’t see the light of Christ
o   Cruz/cruzada/panadera
§  Cruz – woman’s name, also cross
§  Cruzada – crossed/penetrated, also crusade
§  Panadera – woman who sells bread, way of saying prostitute; also giver of bread for communion?
o   Plays with the literary topic of life like a “camino” and also mocks Andalucía (“senda creí carretera / como si fuera andaluz”)
o   Friend as a go-between – You should never use a man as a go-between with a woman – because he may get interested himself
o   One message (first half): we all look for the light of Christ. There are only certain people who can serve as a go-between between Christ and the world; these are the priests, who give the bread of mass. But some priests are bad, and don’t help people find salvation.
o   “él le regaló un conejo” – basically; he had sex with her (conejo symbolizes male genitalia)
o   Ends poem with a metaphor ---- he has been hunting for a woman/“rabbit”, with a “dog” helping him, but the “dog” doesn’t bring him the rabbit back, so it’s of no use……..

-          Juan Ruiz is born under the sign of Venus, so he’s going to naturally be predisposed to certain types of behavior/personality – this plays into the beliefs of people in the time period
o   Astrological stuff influences people – sets limitations on how people are; based on birth

-          “El rey Alcaraz”
o   Summary: the king’s son is born, so he looks for astrologers to know what his son’s future will be like. The astrologers tell him his son will die; each one says by a different way. He puts them all in prison, and then all the prophecies come true in some way.
§  Same type of debate as in the story of the Romans and Greeks – the “wise” men don’t agree about how the son will die (offered 5 possibilities)
§  Example: One astrologer said he would be stoned; the son is out hunting when it hails.
o   Message: the future is not for us to know, just for God. Questioning about predestination and free will…
o   Ambivalent message about the wisdom of men… men can be wise, but future is not for men to know.
§  The three wise men do read the future, but each man can only see a part of the future – the three separate images together describe what actually happens. Men can’t have full knowledge of the future – just God!
o   There are several works/stories like this in medieval literature that propose thoughts about telling the future and particularly predicting manner of death (example: story about Merlin)
o   Reference to three social orders – all three depend on destiny according to astrology/horoscope and God
o   Idea of infabilidad
§  Man can’t determine course of life – can see parts of what will happen but not everything / can’t see end result
o   Message/moral – it’s natural for men to search for future, and they can even read it sometimes; but God created nature and so he can easily change the path of things and do something completely different ------- just like the Virgin Mary can break rules
§  Ruiz demonstrates this with both legal/political law and canonical law. Law is powerful and correct, but God is superior to all law and He can break/circumvent the law.
o   Names various characteristics of love – mixes between courtly love and a slightly more modern approach to love. Names positive characteristics but also negative characteristics / flaws. Refers to the dishonest/deceitful side of love.
o   All people can change their destiny to some extent with the passage of time (metaphor of the pear/apple maturing). As you mature, you leave the world/sin to work towards your salvation.

-          Popular/influencing texts in time period and for Ruiz
o   General interest in time period in the writings of Virgil (esp. before 11th century)
o   Later, interest in the writings of Ovid (mid-11th – 13th centuries);
§  One of Ovid’s texts about how to get a woman was very popular and influenced a lot in later texts about relations between men and women
o   Also popularity of texts of rhetoric
o   Andreas Capellanus – De amore – “manual” on courtly love (main ideas: courtly love is sexual, should be secret, should be difficult to obtain, should ennoble the lover, the woman loved should be superior, symptoms of love include suffering and sickness, and it’s a frustrated love that isn’t ever fulfilled/satisfied)
o   El Pamphilus de amore (siglo 12) – rather popular little work narrating a love story. Touches on theme of sexual promiscuity. Importance of satire of society, and ironic tone. Idea of an impossible love; lover’s frustration.

-          “Don Melón y doña Endrina”
o   Ruiz talks about the person’s life to set the context for the love. The person often loves many women – which is a break with the whole concept of courtly love.


Las Serranas
-          Origin in French “pastourelle”
o   Ruiz’s serranas are some of the very first that appear in Spanish literature. They also appear later in Santillana – with stylistic advances and a touch of courtly love.
-          Basic structure/format: A man goes walking in the country/mountains. He meets a girl from the area. He tries to seduce her; sometimes successful and sometimes not.
-          Style: divided in prose part and poetic/verse part. Prose part gives an introduction. Verse repeats the introduction.
-          They are located in the middle of the book, right before the section about Lent – idea of a last round of sexual pursuits before Lent.
-          The women (“las serranas”) can have different forms, different types of women – they are often called “cowgirls” (“vaquera”)
-          Antonio’s thesis about serranas – that these women are demonized or possessed by the Devil.
-          These serranas serve as a parody of courtly love and the “rules” of love.
o   Ex: in courtly love, the men give women gifts, but the women don’t ask for these gifts. Here, the mountain gals demand gifts and then don’t get them.
-          Introduction to serranas – gives an idea of pilgrimage (“provar todas las cosas el apóstol lo manda / fui a provar la sierra”) and also references the prologue which suggests that you should try everything. There’s nothing good in the countryside, however; it’s a place of sin.
-          “La Chata” (Serrana) – pg. 242
o   Summary: Apostle orders the monks to try everything… “Who seeks what he has never lost should lose all that he has.” On the path, Ruiz sees a mountain girl who calls herself “Bumpkin” (Chata) – calls herself an “uncouth, strong girl” and says she collects a toll for passage, and threatens him with violence. Juan Ruiz offers her several gifts instead of payment and she agrees and takes him to her shanty. She feeds him and then demands to have sex with him. The end!
-          “Gadea de Riofrío” (Serrana) – pg. 250
o   Summary: Goes to Segovia for a bit but misses home so goes back towards monastery (¿). On way, Ruiz meets a hill girl tending cattle; she hits him with her shepherd’s crook and says that’s how she normally gets money from strangers, but then she invites him into her house and says her man doesn’t need to know anything. She feeds him and then they have sex; then she indicates the correct path home for him.
-          “Menga Llorente” (Serrana) – pg. 256
o   “Of all that happened there I made a simple mountain song; Below it’s written in this book which now is in your hand” (s. 996)
o   Summary: Ruiz is wandering around in the mountains and meets a girl and says he’s looking to get married. He lies and says he knows all about mountain ways and she offers to marry him and asks for lots of gifts. He agrees and then says “oh, gotta bail to buy all those gifts!”
-          “Alda de Tablada” (Serrana) – pg. 258
o   Summary: Arcipreste is in the mountains and comes across Alda in the early morning. It’s cold and so he asks her for shelter. (Describes girl’s ugliness). In exchange, she asks him for a red girdle, beads, fur…With these presents “you can be my husband and I will be your wife.” He says he doesn’t have those now and he’ll bring them next time. She says he’ll have to tough it out because she won’t give shelter without gifts. “Nunca de omenaje pagan ostelaje”-promises do not pay for hospitality.
-          “Santa María del Vado” – pg. 270
o   This isn’t exactly a serrana like the others – it just accounts the end of his time in the sierra. This is a way of giving a religious end to the section of the serranas, and establishes the “good love” (for God) – in comparison with the bad love for women. Also completes sense of pilgrimage mentioned in intro to serranas – since he originally said he was going out to sierra for religious reasons.
o   Summary: Since St. James says all good gifts come from the Father, I begged God not to forget me and to forgive me. There was a shrine to the Virgin on that mountain, so I went and composed these verses for her. (What follows is a rather typical prayer to Mary).




Batalla de don Carnal y doña Cuaresma
-          “De la pelea que ovo don Carnal con la Cuaresma” (pg. 278) (“About the Battle of the Lord Flesh-Season and the Lady Lent”)
o   Summary: Lent is starting, so the Arcipreste goes back to his homeland. The Lady of Lent is going to arrive for a time of penitence for all the sins of the Lord of Flesh. Lady Lent addresses letters to Lord of the Flesh setting terms for battle. There will be fasting. Lord of Flesh goes to battle of the fast with soldiers, who are lots of different food items. Lord of Flesh doesn’t do well in battle because he’s full and sluggish. Lady Lent’s soldiers are fish and lean soups (leek soup). Lady Lent wins battle but they don’t kill Lord of Flesh – Lady Lent says he must submit to the fast.
o   Social context of the relationship between lord and vassal; Ruiz uses that idea in Lady Lent’s communication: letters from lord/lady to vassal.
o   Personification of various elements – ex: Sir Fast.
o   Interest in chronology – cites specific days and even times. Includes various aspects of Christian chronology – the liturgical year.
-          “De la penitencia quel fraile dio a don Carnal e de cómo el pecador se deve confessar e quien ha poder de lo absolver” (pg. 290)
o   Summary: A monk comes to Lord of Flesh wanting to make him change his ways. Lord of Flesh asks for penance and writes a confessional letter. But: you can’t be absolved through written papers; you have to verbally confess sins to the holy confessor. You have to believe that you will achieve salvation at end of penance. You can be forgiven by God but not by church. Stopped at stanza 1138. You have to publically demonstrate your penitence rather than hiding your sin.
o   This is one of Juan Ruiz’s asides – didactic purpose of teaching how you have to be absolved from sin. Ruiz uses context of battle to include this lesson. Wanted to speak out against priests inappropriately granting salvation (when they don’t truly have the capacity to do so).
-          “De lo que se faze Miércoles Corvillo e en la Cuaresma” (pg. 300)
o   Summary: Lady Lent enters homes of everyone on Ash Wednesday and marks foreheads of true believers with ash cross (ashes to ashes, dust to dust). Lord of Flesh is gaining strength again – in order to corrupt. Lord of Flesh escapes on Palm Sunday (before Ash Wednesday) and goes to sin – goes to the Jews and their butchery to break his forced fast (stanza 1183). Don Carnal sends a letter to his vassals declaring a second battle with Dona Cuaresma (carta de desafío).
o   ** Carta de desafío – there is a set pattern which is always followed. Not meant for the person that the writer is opposing, but rather to the general public as a kind of heads up about what’s going to go down.
o   Use of symbols that help to elaborate the representation of don Carnal. Description of his very triumphant entry in the city, carrying a scythe/axe – comparable to death. (Idea of salvation with Cuaresma vs. death with Carnal). Don Carnal is dressed like a butcher.
-           “De cómo don Amor e don Carnal venieron e los salieron a rescebir” (pg. 308); “De cómo clérigos e legos e fraires e monjas e dueñas e joglares salieron a recebir a don Amor” (pg. 310)
o   Importance of music for Ruiz – extensive list of musical instruments
o   Conflict between clerics and frays
-           “Don Carnal” is sometimes “don Carnaval”
-          Interest in the book in chronology – division of days and years. This section about lent fits into that theme.
-          Also the theme of allegorical use of animals and food.


Horas canónicas – horario litúrgico
-          “Aquí fabla de la pelea quel arcipreste ovo con don Amor” (pg. 112)
o   Summary: The evilness of love – simple words to catch everyone possible. Love’s mockery of faithful prayers.  Love tempts people to sin.
o   Juan Ruiz starts his description of the liturgical day with nighttime (vespers).
o   Ruiz talks about his desire to live well and his sexual desire for women, but in context/frame of liturgy.
o   Ruiz uses Biblical passages to mock fleshly pursuits/activities – manipulates biblical words to create double meaning and imply sexual activities. Uses sacred text in a secular context --- this is like a type of literature called “Contrafacta.”
-          ** Contrafacta – someone takes a holy hymn and applies a new, secular set of lyrics to it, or applies a holy hymn to a worldly situation. This is not necessarily negative, but can be very burlesque/parodic. This is a very old literary tradition.
-          Idea of liturgical year can be applied to a specific time or to a person’s entire life. For example, in person’s entire life – a person is born and dies, and somewhere in there the person converts…
-          There’s a liturgical year but also a liturgical day – how prayer should be done over course of day
o   There’s a schedule for when certain prayers should be done at indicated times.
Maitines, laudes, prima, tercia, sexta, nona, visperas, completa